第77节

    sketonialings,official

    randu,andsostproscuousvarietyoftopics,

    historiostallsuch

    eeringthe

    factthatnyoftheseauthorshaveelseteivetreatisesonspecial

    topics,thisproscuityisperhapspardonable.againstsudions,

    hooftheliterary

    aanyauthors,andtheonlyliteraryaost,andthattheyrepresent

    totheese”literature”parexe.aeseschoolboy,incultivatingaprose

    style,isdetorepeataseleodels.

    furtherhefaendousliterary

    aendousnuerofsendously

    literaryi.

    perhapsodestandardan

    elentisalanjoysandsorrohesehere

    eerestedin.

    butbeingde,odestandard.whenonereads

    kueiyukuangsbiographiother,ost

    eandleaderofaliteraryvent,ahatthisisthehighestprodueofdevotiontoleaing,andthendisversinitonlya

    purelylinguistiraftsnshipinitatingtheas,laidoverapaucityof

    ent,onehasarighttobe

    disappointed.

    goodprosethereisinesealliterature,butoneofinditfor

    oneself,haneandardofvaluation.herforliberationofthoughtand

    sentintorforliberationofstyle,oneongaclassofslightly

    unorthodox,uch

    intellectualhattheysthavehadanaturalfortheassofstyle.

    suchei,liliweng,

    kungtingan,allofellectualrebels,andingsher

    bannedreatlydepreeoraheyhadthat

    personalstyleofingorofthoughthodoxschardedasfriendlyto

    radiorality.

    vi.literatureandpolitics

    itisnaturalthatthebondageoflanguagehasbroughthitthebohought.

    theliterarylanguagehatituldnotexpressathought.it

    alidstsueralities,ha

    totallaiplineinlogicalreasoning,esescholarsoftendisplayedan

    extreent.thisdisparitybethoughtandliterature

    broughtaboutasituationhoughtandliteraturewereregardedashavingno

    relatioher.

    thisbringsustotherelatioureandpolitiordertouand

    esepolitieshoulduandeseliterature.perhapsoneshouldhere

    avoidtheeraturetreshis

    eaveritableniaiion.thisis

    ents,rcial

    s,thefirstthoughtishow

    toketheicesounding,hobeautifully.andthefirstthoughtofa

    sreads

    alstalostalbeautifully.apalpablelieis

    praisedifitistoldingoodfor

    thishasledtoatypeofbelleslettress

    extrelysilly.thusinaparativelyretstatentbyaniortantpolitical

    partyesouationalsntyandinvadesourterritory,

    outhepeaceofthe

    ined..,.ost,...ustunite

    together....”adepubliestialsituationofthe

    ntaailedatoftheeansbyheyaregoing

    to”driveout”theinvadersand”stop9thebreakersofiionalpeace.this

    literarylpraeses,asrcial

    advertisentforsilkstoofalongfivehundredwordessay,

    beginninganchurianprovinceshavebeenlost....”

    thatdoesnotan,hopleheir

    literatureisfullofgeneralities,butitisnotsile.ratherorary,frohis

    hedgingabouttheprobleandthesevaguegeneralitiesofexpression,therehas

    developed,straosay,theutstfinesseofexpression.theese,versedin

    thisliterarytraining,haveleaedtoreadbethelines,anditisthefners3

    inabilitytoreadbetissingthe

    ”aningbeyocausesthefn

    rrespooselvesfortheirinabilitytokeheador

    tailofsuleverlylesspublicstatents.

    fortheingwordslargelydue,aswehaveseen,

    tothenosyllabiteroftheliterarylanguage梐ndis

    ihevictoryinapoliticalal

    struggle.esecivilof

    exs.thepublicassiduouslyreadthisexgeofabusivenessor

    ofpolitereationsorevenbrazenfacedlies,anddecideter

    literarystyle,inousclo

    ...