第28节
【】thinkoflawasan abstratity,butasaflexiblequantityasitshouldbepersonallyappliedtolonel thepersonalityoflonelhuangorjorliisinhunandthereforenolaall. esejusticeisanart,notasce. 1thisrefers,ofurse,togeneralanhoodasbroughtaboutbythepresentsocial syste jespersen,inhishandstructureofenglish,once referredtothesequalitiesoftheenglishlanguagebypointingtoitsloveof eno,nsenseandforcefulness.houtontradictsogreatan authorityojitheenglishlanguage,ibegtodifferonapointhesexes. nsehepraharasofenratherthanof n,oreliabletotaketheirfeetoffthegroundandsoartoiossible heights.theeselanguageandgraarshoinilybecausethe language,initsforsyntaxandvocabulary,revealsaresilicityof thinking,nageryandenoofsyntaalrelationships. thissilicityisbestillustratedfroidgihese bones,ase,youno e;youe,henoe”shouldnotbensideredasclearasthere roundabout”youe,ifhees,andhe.e,ifyoue.”in faoon,indeansenglish,quotes anenglishsorsetfarrastestifyingbeforethejudge:”hedastidheda stidhelickedhe,andhelickedhe;ifhelickedheashardashelickedhe,heda killedhe,andnothehe,”andthisseetoachresensiblealking thanoneaniasedistins.ftotheese,the differeplex,andtheaddingofthethirdpersonsingularending”s” isassuperfluousasisalreadyprovedtobeitenseihad,hehad;i,he things”houtever beingsuoodorlosinganythingexceptaaningless”class”hhas nothingtodohthebeautyofexpression.ihavegreathopethatenglishand ariprofessorsablypronouncea”hedont”in thesandthattheenglishlanguageyonedaybeeassensibleand clearastheese,throughtheinfluenceofpidgin. acertainfenineprathasalreadyguidedtheenglishtoabbreviateall theirsubordinatehaspossible,like”itting5”god ed”ifidontnotshallnot ebaightand”ifnotshallbreakoutweek.” jespersenalreadyntionssuplicityinenglishas”first e,firstserved”nocure,nopay,””oen,tandard pidgin.theyarebeginningtodropthe”,”too”o”. englishgraaristhereforenotfarfroalvation.theplicityis, hoountaiy”othe eseclearlyansthat”ifyouonlysitaanddonothing,evenafortuneas bigasauntaiibeforetheenglish huphus. theeseehinkingalsobeillustratedbythenatureofits abstraetaphoricexpressions.anabstract notionisoftenexpressedbythebinationoftall” for”size,””longshort”for”length,””broadnarroh””isthe bigsllofyourshoes”.”long”and”short”alsoreferthtandwrongof partiesindispute,astheeseexpressioislongor short”andthereforeilar totheenglish”thelongandtheshortofitis....”and”thatnhasnhtwrong” aningheisagoodnbecausehepreservesagodlikeindiffereowardall questions,agetinvolvedinprivatedisputes.abstradingslike”ness” arealsounknoplysay,encius,that”the eastheeofaejade.”thishasabearing ontheirlackoianalytiking. en,sofarasiknos.this,ithink,hasbeenprovedby ananalyticalstudyofthevocabularyofenauthors.theanalytical,statistical thouch ogotothetroubleofuntingoproveit.he truthdirectlythatensvocabularyinspeedingisdecidedlylessabstract, thatissuffi.ageryalways takestheplainology.thehighlyacadetehereisno differedifferenceofdegreebetdegreesofdifferendnodifference3otbeexactlyreproduese,andaesetranslatorwould probablysubstituteforitthenquestion:”isthediffereween runningaystepsandrunningaepsinbattle”sucha substituteexpressionlosesindefinitioness,butgainsinintelligibility.to say,”hoentalprocesses”isnotsointelligibleas”how uldiknoind”,andthisintuisdecidedlyless affectivethantheese”aatapeinhisbelly” esethought,therefore,alainsontheperipheryofthevisibleworld,and thishelpsasenseoffact.this dislikeofabstractterisfurtherseenintheesenasforationsh usuallyrequiresharplydefier.iheesealost expressivenasfordifferentthereare differentthodsofethodofgafireacrossth ...