第28节

    【】thinkoflawasan

    abstratity,butasaflexiblequantityasitshouldbepersonallyappliedtolonel


    thepersonalityoflonelhuangorjorliisinhunandthereforenolaall.

    esejusticeisanart,notasce.

    1thisrefers,ofurse,togeneralanhoodasbroughtaboutbythepresentsocial

    syste

    jespersen,inhishandstructureofenglish,once

    referredtothesequalitiesoftheenglishlanguagebypointingtoitsloveof

    eno,nsenseandforcefulness.houtontradictsogreatan

    authorityojitheenglishlanguage,ibegtodifferonapointhesexes.

    nsehepraharasofenratherthanof

    n,oreliabletotaketheirfeetoffthegroundandsoartoiossible

    heights.theeselanguageandgraarshoinilybecausethe

    language,initsforsyntaxandvocabulary,revealsaresilicityof

    thinking,nageryandenoofsyntaalrelationships.

    thissilicityisbestillustratedfroidgihese

    bones,ase,youno

    e;youe,henoe”shouldnotbensideredasclearasthere

    roundabout”youe,ifhees,andhe.e,ifyoue.”in

    faoon,indeansenglish,quotes

    anenglishsorsetfarrastestifyingbeforethejudge:”hedastidheda

    stidhelickedhe,andhelickedhe;ifhelickedheashardashelickedhe,heda

    killedhe,andnothehe,”andthisseetoachresensiblealking

    thanoneaniasedistins.ftotheese,the

    differeplex,andtheaddingofthethirdpersonsingularending”s”

    isassuperfluousasisalreadyprovedtobeitenseihad,hehad;i,he

    things”houtever

    beingsuoodorlosinganythingexceptaaningless”class”hhas

    nothingtodohthebeautyofexpression.ihavegreathopethatenglishand

    ariprofessorsablypronouncea”hedont”in

    thesandthattheenglishlanguageyonedaybeeassensibleand

    clearastheese,throughtheinfluenceofpidgin.

    acertainfenineprathasalreadyguidedtheenglishtoabbreviateall

    theirsubordinatehaspossible,like”itting5”god

    ed”ifidontnotshallnot

    ebaightand”ifnotshallbreakoutweek.”

    jespersenalreadyntionssuplicityinenglishas”first

    e,firstserved”nocure,nopay,””oen,tandard

    pidgin.theyarebeginningtodropthe”,”too”o”.

    englishgraaristhereforenotfarfroalvation.theplicityis,

    hoountaiy”othe

    eseclearlyansthat”ifyouonlysitaanddonothing,evenafortuneas

    bigasauntaiibeforetheenglish

    huphus.

    theeseehinkingalsobeillustratedbythenatureofits

    abstraetaphoricexpressions.anabstract

    notionisoftenexpressedbythebinationoftall”

    for”size,””longshort”for”length,””broadnarroh””isthe

    bigsllofyourshoes”.”long”and”short”alsoreferthtandwrongof

    partiesindispute,astheeseexpressioislongor

    short”andthereforeilar

    totheenglish”thelongandtheshortofitis....”and”thatnhasnhtwrong”

    aningheisagoodnbecausehepreservesagodlikeindiffereowardall

    questions,agetinvolvedinprivatedisputes.abstradingslike”ness”

    arealsounknoplysay,encius,that”the

    eastheeofaejade.”thishasabearing

    ontheirlackoianalytiking.

    en,sofarasiknos.this,ithink,hasbeenprovedby

    ananalyticalstudyofthevocabularyofenauthors.theanalytical,statistical

    thouch

    ogotothetroubleofuntingoproveit.he

    truthdirectlythatensvocabularyinspeedingisdecidedlylessabstract,

    thatissuffi.ageryalways

    takestheplainology.thehighlyacadetehereisno

    differedifferenceofdegreebetdegreesofdifferendnodifference3otbeexactlyreproduese,andaesetranslatorwould

    probablysubstituteforitthenquestion:”isthediffereween

    runningaystepsandrunningaepsinbattle”sucha

    substituteexpressionlosesindefinitioness,butgainsinintelligibility.to

    say,”hoentalprocesses”isnotsointelligibleas”how

    uldiknoind”,andthisintuisdecidedlyless

    affectivethantheese”aatapeinhisbelly”

    esethought,therefore,alainsontheperipheryofthevisibleworld,and

    thishelpsasenseoffact.this

    dislikeofabstractterisfurtherseenintheesenasforationsh

    usuallyrequiresharplydefier.iheesealost

    expressivenasfordifferentthereare

    differentthodsofethodofgafireacrossth

    ...